Skip to main content

In The Last Days: When the Church is Exposed for Greed and Not Being Charitable ‘After All’

In The Last Days: When the Church is Exposed for Greed and Not Being Charitable ‘After All’

By QCP Media

In the last days, truth has a way of revealing itself, not through prophecy alone, but through the actions of those who claim to walk in truth.

A viral social media experiment by a young woman named Nikalie Monroe has set off a firestorm of debate across the internet about the modern church, charity, and accountability. Her series, which began as a TikTok experiment, shows Monroe calling various churches across the country, from Kentucky to Louisiana, posing as a desperate mother of a two-month-old baby who had run out of formula. As the phone rings, the faint sound of a baby crying plays in the background.

Her question was simple:

“Can you help me get a can of baby formula?”

But the answers revealed something deeper than anyone expected.

Over the course of 37 recorded calls, many churches offered apologies but no assistance — some saying their outreach was only for members, others citing lack of funds or available resources. Yet, a few — including two Christian churches and one Islamic center — did respond with compassion, immediately offering to purchase the formula.

Among those praised online was the Islamic Center of Charlotte in North Carolina, which issued a heartfelt statement after their clip went viral:

“To know that our actions helped shift a perspective and allowed you to witness the heart of Islam is a powerful affirmation of the values we strive to live by.”

Their words resonated deeply across faith communities, and sparked even more questions about what Christianity, the world’s most vocal religion about giving, truly practices behind closed doors.

Not everyone took Monroe’s experiment well. One church that declined the request, Living Faith Christian Center in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, became a focal point after its pastor, Bishop Raymond W. Johnson, publicly condemned the experiment during his Sunday sermon.

“The person who pretends to have a crying baby to trick churches — that’s low,” Johnson said, calling Monroe’s actions “the spirit of a witch.”




Johnson defended his church’s charitable record, saying they have quietly fed thousands without seeking recognition. Still, the internet’s reaction was divided, some agreeing that deception shouldn’t be used to test faith, while others questioned why a simple request for baby formula warranted such a harsh rebuke.

Another pastor, Dr. Matt Brown of Germantown Baptist Church, also faced backlash after denying the same request. Online users began digging into the church’s financial records and posting inconsistencies between its public image of generosity and its actual financial transparency. Soon, former members began sharing stories of “church hurt” — times they turned to the church for help only to be denied, shamed, or silenced.

The collective outrage has reignited a timeless question:

What is the role of the church if not to feed the hungry and care for the poor?

Many critics have pointed to Malachi 3:10, the scripture often quoted during offering time, “Bring ye all the tithes into the storehouse, that there may be meat in mine house.”

But if the storehouse is full, they ask, where is the meat for the widow, the orphan, and the struggling mother with no milk for her baby?

Too often, parishioners are urged to “sow a seed” even when their own lights are being cut off, while pastors drive luxury cars and live in gated communities. Some congregations equate questioning leadership with “rebellion against God.” In doing so, the church that once comforted the broken now rebukes them for speaking up.



Whether Monroe’s experiment was right or wrong, it undeniably exposed something raw about the state of faith in America. The conversation isn’t about one woman’s prank — it’s about a system of selective compassion.

The same churches that preach forgiveness sometimes fail to extend it. The same pulpits that condemn greed can appear steeped in it. And the same institutions that call for repentance may now be facing their own reckoning.

If the church truly desires revival, it must start not with another conference, another tithe message, or another campaign, but with humility. The kind that looks a desperate mother in the eye, real or not, and says:

“We’ll find a way to help.”

Because in the last days, it won’t be the sinner who exposes the church, it will be the silence of those who stopped caring.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

✨ Chapter Preview: “Dismemberment” | A Grown Woman’s Game ✨

  ✨ Chapter Preview: “Dismemberment” | A Grown Woman’s Game ✨ “Dismemberment” – A Grown Woman’s Game 💔✂️ When is cutting someone off necessary… and why does it feel like losing a part of yourself? In this powerful new chapter, Candace L. Smith gets real about the hard truth behind dismembering toxic relationships. It’s not always clean. It’s not always easy. But sometimes, it’s the only way to survive — and heal. 🕊️ If you’ve ever had to walk away from someone you loved, this one’s for YOU. 💡 📚 Now available on Amazon in print & digital download. 🎯 Grab your copy today — A Grown Woman’s Game will change the way you love, heal, and protect your peace. 🔗 https://amzn.to/3pnoN3S

Why You Might Be Paying More Than Your Neighbor for the Same Product

Surveillance Pricing: The Hidden Cost of Your Personal Data Have you ever noticed that prices seem to fluctuate depending on how and where you shop? Maybe you’ve used Instacart or another grocery delivery app and found that the price of your favorite milk online is higher than what you’d pay in-store. At first, these small discrepancies might seem like an unavoidable part of online shopping. But what if I told you that businesses might be charging you more based on who you are? Surveillance pricing is a practice where companies use personal data—such as your age, gender, income level, or even your location—to adjust the prices you see. Essentially, what you pay for everyday items could depend on what retailers assume you can afford. A recent Federal Trade Commission (FTC) study revealed how this type of pricing discrimination is becoming more common, with companies using advanced algorithms to analyze consumer behavior and set prices accordingly. For example, someone shopping in a low...

The Ones Closest to You Can Hurt You The Worst.

 The Ones Closest to You Can Hurt You the Worst. It’s cold down here in sunny Florida so I’m bundled up at the office, but I had to share something that came across my mind. I thought about a conversation I had with a friend years ago. I didn’t quite get to finish my thought, but I said all of this to say, “when someone shows you who they are believe them the first time.” Thank you, Maya Angelou. Sometimes the ones closest to you and know you best are the ones they can hurt you the most because they have the information. They know you. If you’ve been in relationship (friend or family or romantic) for a long time they understand the things that can hurt, you through trial and error. It’s never an accident when they scare you with spiders when you’ve told them you’re afraid of them. They know what to do to move you emotionally and sometimes it’s only for their sick and twisted enjoyment. It’s not friendship and it never was. And when they show you that, even in a “joke” trust and...